Responding cautiously to the user

I want to respond carefully by asking for more context. I could suggest summarizing if they share the article and encourage reading the original source. I'll use neutral phrasing, like “According to The Times report published on [date],” without asserting it as a fact. Also, I should provide some background on Brighton's owner and how to assess such reports. I should clarify what the user intends: do they want a summary, background, or timeline?Using cautious language for sensitive statements

\n

The statement is sensitive, so I need to approach it carefully. I’ll use language that avoids false claims and ask for more information. I should suggest checking reputable sources and avoid repeating details. It’s important to clarify what the user wants: a summary, background on Brighton ownership, potential implications under Premier League rules, or legal context. Since we're discussing allegations, I’ll remind them they are unproven and refer to the presumption of innocence. I'll draft in Chinese for better communication.